My answer here: https://catholicism.io/2019/05/31/pope-francis-on-gods-will-and-the-diversity-of-religions/
-
The Reproach of Christ now features guest posts by: Francisco Figueroa
Pope Francis is Our Holy Father, Supreme Head of the whole Church, Father and Teacher of all Christians, and Supreme Pontiff.
Papal critics: “Let us explain to you why Pope Francis is wrong.”
Ron Conte: “Let me explain to you what the word ‘faith’ means.”
Those who reject the Magisterium, grasp at straws seeking its replacement.
-
The CPDV -- my conservative Catholic translation of the Bible, from the Latin Vulgate into English, is available at Amazon.com in Kindle format and online here.
-
To read the Kindle versions of my books, without a Kindle device, get the free cloud reader — or — any of the free Kindle reading apps.
Subscribe to my RSS Feed. (If you use Google Chrome, first add a Chrome RSS reader or extension.)
+ Important Posts
- A Primer on Roman Catholic Salvation Theology
- How To Go To Heaven
- Intrinsic Evil and the Moral Object
- Profession of Fidelity to Pope Francis
- The Certainty of Salvation for Prenatals who die before birth
- The Many Errors of Religious Fundamentalism
- What Saint Bellarmine really said about Popes and Heresy
+ Salvation
Biblical Topics
Catholic Theology
Eschatology
- First Part of the Tribulation
- Great Catholic Monarch and the Angelic Shepherd
- Kingdom of the Ten Kings
- On World War 3 and World War 4
- Second Part of the Tribulation
- Secrets of La Salette and the End Times
- Secrets of Medjugorje and Garabandal
- The Bible and the Future: 2015 edition
- The Return of Jesus Christ
- The Warning, Consolation, and Miracle
- Three Days of Darkness and the Time of Peace
Free Booklets
Mariology
Moral Theology
Other Topics
Some Links
Versions of the Bible
Categories
Archives
Meta
Add this badge to your site:
-
If the works of God seem foolish to you, who is the fool — God or you?
Sign: Unattended children will be given an espresso and a free kitten.
Ron, you carefully avoid to face the actual problem, which is not merely heretical teaching, but teaching – or just thinking aloud – allowing different understandings from different audiences. What is at least not orthodox, is to state one thing and the opposite at the same time. To me, this method alone can be described as heresy, regardless of the substantial truth that is involved at each time. The only fact that this is allowed testifies that truth is not being served but confusion.
The First Vatican Council taught as dogma that each Pope has the gift of truth and a never failing faith, in accord with the teaching of the Gospel (so it is an infallible and divinely revealed truth). Your opinion is contrary to that dogma. The Pope is not guilty of heresy, but all his accusers are guilty of heresy, for contradicting the dogma of the First Vatican Council.
https://catholicism.io/2019/03/26/the-roman-pontiff-immunity-from-error-and-never-failing-faith/
Methods are never heresy, nor is heresy ever based on how things seem to anyone. Heresy contradicts formal dogma, and that is what your claim does.