contraception with a good intention

Some commentators are claiming that contraception is only immoral when the intent is to contracept, i.e. when contraception is used with the purpose of preventing conception. Not true. The Magisterium teaches that there are three fonts of morality: (1) intention, … Continue reading

More Galleries

The Errors of Michael Voris: anti-Judaism

Michael Voris (on the website and on YouTube) does not present orthodox Catholic teaching. Michael Voris, S.T.B., seems to be the only teacher, formerly at RealCatholicTV, and now at ChurchMilitant.tv — Voris was told by his Bishop to stop using … Continue reading

More Galleries

More on contraception outside of marriage

Pope Benedict XVI’s comment about condoms is in itself not very interesting. He merely notes that the intention to avoid disease transmission — out of concern for other persons — is a good intention. But of course one good font, … Continue reading

More Galleries

The discussion on the Latin text of Humanae Vitae continues

over on his blog, Steve Skellmeyer mentions my article on the Latin text of Humanae Vitae, and he discusses the topic of contraception outside of marriage further. It’s worth a read.

Posted in theology | Comments Off on The discussion on the Latin text of Humanae Vitae continues

Howard Hawks: What makes a movie good?

Howard Hawkes, famed American director, producer and screenwriter, asked the question: What makes a movie good? His answer: Three good scenes; no bad scenes. This seems like an odd answer. Why not say all scenes should be good, or ‘at … Continue reading

More Galleries

Jimmy Akin’s Heretical Errors on Salvation

I’ve updated my article, detailing the heretical errors taught by Jimmy Akin on the subject of salvation, to note that his book, The Salvation Controversy, also teaches these same errors. Akin’s article, A Tiptoe Through TULIP, is also a chapter … Continue reading

More Galleries

Lisa Fullam, heretic and professor of moral theology at a Catholic university

Lisa Fullam, D.V.M., Th.D, teaches at the Jesuit school of theology at Santa Clara University. SCU is a Catholic university. None of Fullam’s degrees are from Catholic colleges or universities: A.B., Cornell University; D.V.M., Cornell University; M.T.S., Harvard Divinity School; … Continue reading

More Galleries

a summary of the three fonts of morality

A font is a source, or basis, or cause for the morality of an act. An act is immoral if any one or more of these fonts is bad. An act is moral only if all of the fonts of morality are good. There are three fonts of morality.

FIRST FONT: The intended end (or purpose) for which the act is chosen.

SECOND FONT: The inherent ordering of the act itself toward its moral object. This ordering constitutes the moral species, i.e. the essential moral nature, of the chosen act.

THIRD FONT: The circumstances pertaining to the morality of the act, especially the consequences.

Catechism of the Catholic Church: “The morality of human acts depends on: the object chosen; the end in view or the intention; the circumstances of the action. The object, the intention, and the circumstances make up the ‘sources,’ or constitutive elements, of the morality of human acts.”

Compendium of the Catechism: “The morality of human acts depends on three sources: the object chosen, either a true or apparent good; the intention of the subject who acts, that is, the purpose for which the subject performs the act; and the circumstances of the act, which include its consequences.”

USCCB Catechism: “Every moral act consists of three elements: the objective act (what we do), the subjective goal or intention (why we do the act), and the concrete situation or circumstances in which we perform the act…. All three aspects must be good — the objective act, the subjective intention, and the circumstances — in order to have a morally good act.”

There is no other basis for the morality of an act apart from these three fonts. For any act to be moral, all three fonts must be good. If any one font is bad, the act is immoral, even if the other fonts are good. Each and every knowingly chosen act is judged solely by the three fonts of morality. The three fonts of morality are the sole determinant of the morality of each and every knowingly chosen act, without any exception whatsoever. Whoever contradicts this teaching has overturned the very foundation of every moral teaching in the one holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

from the Catechism of Catholic Ethics, n. 33, available at Amazon.com

by Ron Conte

Posted in ethics, theology | Comments Off on a summary of the three fonts of morality

contraception and the principle of double effect

Is contraception ever justified by the principle of double effect?

Some commentators claim that the use of contraception in marriage might be justified by the principle of double effect. This claim is contrary to the definitive teaching of the Magisterium on contraception and on the basic principles of morality.

The Magisterium teaches that the use of contraception is intrinsically evil. But the principle of double effect never justifies intrinsically evil acts. In order to be moral under the principle of double effect, the chosen act must have a good moral object, not an evil moral object.

An act is justified under the principle of double effect, despite having both a good effect and a bad effect, only if the intention is good, and the moral object is good, and the good effects (all the reasonably anticipated good consequences) morally outweigh the bad effects (all the reasonably anticipated bad consequences). The consequences include considerations such as avoding scandal, the likelihood of the good and bad effects, the gravity of those effects (harm/benefit), and how closely related the effects are to the chosen act.

Intrinsically evil acts always have an evil moral object. Therefore, the use of contraception is never justified by the principle of double effect.

by Ron Conte

Posted in ethics, theology of the body | Comments Off on contraception and the principle of double effect

Catholic orthodoxy quiz #1

True or False?

1. The soul is the form of the body.
True.
Fifth Lateran Council: “For the soul not only truly exists of itself and essentially as the form of the human body, as is said in the canon of our predecessor of happy memory, pope Clement V, promulgated in the general council of Vienne, but it is also immortal”

2. In order for a Sacrament to be valid, the person dispensing a Sacrament must intend to do what the Church does.
True.
Council of Trent: “CANON XI. If any one saith, that, in ministers, when they effect, and confer the sacraments, there is not required the intention at least of doing what the Church does; let him be anathema.”

3. Is it impossible to qualify as morally evil the deliberate choice of certain kinds of behavior or specific acts, without taking into account the intention for which the choice was made or the totality of the foreseeable consequences of that act for all persons concerned.
False.
Intrinsically evil acts are immoral regardless of intention or circumstances, so one does not need to know the intention, or the consequences, in order to determine that an intrinsically evil act is morally evil. (See Veritatis Splendor)

4. The Church forbids the faithful from rejecting any written or unwritten tradition of the Church.
True.
“If anyone rejects any written or unwritten tradition of the church, let him be anathema.” (Second Council of Nicea, 787 A.D.)

5. Each and every sexual act in a marriage needs to be open to the possibility of conceiving a child.
True.
See the USCCB Catechism, p. 409. See also Humanae Vitae, n. 11-14.

6. The legitimate intentions of a married couple may justify the use of contraception in some circumstances.
False.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church: “Legitimate intentions on the part of the spouses do not justify recourse to morally unacceptable means (for example, direct sterilization or contraception).” (CCC, n. 2399).

7. Baptism infuses only the three theological virtues: love, faith, and hope. The intellectual and moral virtues are acquired, not infused.
False.
Although the intellectual and moral virtues may be acquired, prior to Baptism, to some extent, they are also infused by Baptism, and strengthened by Confirmation.

8. The primary ends of marriage are, equally, the reciprocal gift and possession of the married couple in joy and delight, and the procreation and education of children.
False.
The procreation and education of offspring is the primary end of marriage. Other ends are secondary. See Address to Midwives by Pope Pius XII.

9. Everyone is free to contradict the Pope when he gives his own personal opinion, not an exercise of the Magisterium.
True.
The Pope’s personal opinion, even on a matter of faith or morals, is not an exercise of the Church’s teaching authority, and has the same weight as the opinion of any similarly knowledgeable and devout member of the faithful.

10. The Bible is inerrant on matters of faith and morals, and even on matters of physical science or history.
True.
The sacred Council of Trent ordained by solemn decree that “the entire books with all their parts, as they have been wont to be read in the Catholic Church and are contained in the old vulgate Latin edition, are to be held sacred and canonical.” In our own time the Vatican Council, with the object of condemning false doctrines regarding inspiration, declared that these same books were to be regarded by the Church as sacred and canonical “not because, having been composed by human industry, they were afterwards approved by her authority, nor merely because they contain revelation without error, but because, having been written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God for their author, and as such were handed down to the Church herself.” When, subsequently, some Catholic writers, in spite of this solemn definition of Catholic doctrine, by which such divine authority is claimed for the “entire books with all their parts” as to secure freedom from any error whatsoever, ventured to restrict the truth of Sacred Scripture solely to matters of faith and morals, and to regard other matters, whether in the domain of physical science or history, as “obiter dicta” and – as they contended – in no wise connected with faith, Our Predecessor of immortal memory, Leo XIII in the Encyclical Letter Providentissimus Deus, published on November 18 in the year 1893, justly and rightly condemned these errors and safe-guarded the studies of the Divine Books by most wise precepts and rules. (Pope Pius XII, Divino Afflante Spiritu, n. 1)

Posted in theology | Comments Off on Catholic orthodoxy quiz #1

group of priests ask Cardinal to resign

A group of priests has publicly asked the Cardinal Archbishop of Seoul to resign. What grave sin did he commit that he should resign from his position as successor to the Apostles and leader in the Church? He criticized the … Continue reading

More Galleries

Contra Eric Giunta on contraception

In his article and blog-post, Eric Giunta makes several heretical claims about the teaching of the Church on contraception. I will briefly refute his errors here. But see my series of articles on contraception and heresy at Catechism.cc for more … Continue reading

More Galleries