UPDATE from recent visitor to the Sanctuary:
from Ben Carter, (@BCJCarter)
“THREAD ON THE ST. PETER STATUE – PROOF”
“My friend Carlos Caso-Rosendi set out today to the shrine from his home on Buenes Aries, & has sent out ths note & close-up photograph.”
Carlos as reported by Ben Carter, states that Cardinal Bergoglio (Pope Francis) was never Bishop over that area, in which is located the Sanctuary and statue. That is Buenos Aires province, but not the same diocese as Buenos Aires, the city.
Carlos states that the statue was struck by lightning, which damaged the right hand and the key of the Saint Peter statue (See the photo confirmation here). Ben Carter claims the Halo was destroyed also, but other sources with photo (below) show that the Halo was removed prior to the now confirmed lightning strike.
UPDATE from the Sanctuary:
per Steven O’Reilly (@S_OReilly_USA) on X/Twitter: he emailed the Sanctuary and received a reply. The translation of the reply was this:
“The interpretation of the facts that circulate through these media is not real, which is why the Sanctuary does not endorse or agree with them.”
Another report online included this photo, which shows the St. Peter statue without the Halo, but undamaged in its right hand and key. This appears to mean that the Halo was removed prior to the alleged Dec. 17th event.
New conclusion: I must now admit that I was wrong in saying that the statue was not struck by lightning. Note that the statue is low to the ground, against a building that is much higher AND per Carlos and Ben Carter despite a lightning rod 30 or 40 feet above the statue on top of the sanctuary dome.
However, the Sanctuary stated in an email to Steven O’Reilly that they do not agree with the interpretation, and I take the same position. We cannot use a lightning strike on a statue to conclude that the Roman Pontiff has erred gravely, or has lost his authority, or any other conclusion contrary to doctrine.
Original Article follows
Report
See the photo below. There are a few reports on this claim in social media. I could find no reports from any type of news organization. The claim is that lightning struck a statue of Saint Peter on 17 Dec 2023, the day before FS was released by Pope Francis. The photo shows a statue of Saint Peter with a staff in his left hand, a key in his right hand, and a halo. The alleged post-lightning strike version of the photo shows the key gone and the right hand obliterated. The halo is also gone.
Commentary
Update: I have confirmed from a local news source “El Norte” that there was a storm warning for the area of the Sanctuary on 17 Dec 2023, including warnings of “very strong electrical activity”.
The post-lighting strike photo appears to be fake, for the following reasons:
* None of the social media ports or discussion seem to have been posted on or just after the alleged date of the lightning strike, 17 Dec 2023.
* No news websites reported this event.
* Even if lightning had struck a statue, it would not remove the halo, without any damage to the head of the statue, and it would not likely leave the hand with the unusual shape and color shown.
* The Before and After photos differ in a few ways. The Before photos has a prominent shadow; the After photo has no shadow. The background of the After photo has a different coloring to the side of the building, possibly caused by photoshopping the statue image out of the After photo; the Before photo has a shadow showing the Key in the hand. The Before photo shows a graphic appearing to have been etched into the breast of the statue, just behind the Key; the After photo shows no trace of that marking.
* I could not find any picture of any statue of Saint Peter at the alleged location, the Sanctuary of Mary of the Rosary of Saint Nicolas, other than the alleged Before and After photos. Updated: thanks to a commenter below who confirmed the statue itself is real. See also this Wikipedia image of the Sanctuary. The statue is to the right of the entrance. However, this does not prove that the lightning strike was real.
* Lighting strikes the tops of buildings, but striking a statue near ground level, set into the side of a building is highly unlikely.
* Claims by the same social media sources that the Sanctuary confirmed the event, with a quoted statement, could not be verified.
* Claims that a priest confirmed the event cite a priest from France, not Argentina.
* The claim appears to have the purpose of discrediting Pope Francis and his document FS issued the day after the date of the alleged lightning strike.
* A search of a local online newspaper, “Diario El Norte is a newspaper from the city of San Nicolas de los Arroyos, Buenos Aires, Argentina”, showed many results for the Sanctuary and none for lightning striking one of its statues.
I’ve emailed the Sanctuary, asking about this claim. No response yet.
The Interpretation of the Lighting Strike
The social media posts promoting this claim give a particular interpretation, that God caused the lightning to strike a Statue of Saint Peter in Argentina as a way to discredit Pope Francis and particularly his document issued the next day. Some interpretations go into detail, noting that the Key of Saint Peter and his Halo are gone, but the Shepherd’s staff remains. This is said to be due to Pope Francis being a shepherd without the authority or holiness of Saint Peter.
My interpretation is as follows. Natural events are not a sign from God. If there is an eclipse of the sun or moon, if there is an earthquake or tidal way or volcanic eruption, these are merely natural events that occur from time to time. Consider what Moses said about such signs:
[Numbers]
{16:28} And Moses said: “By this shall you know that the Lord has sent me to do all that you discern, and that I have not brought these things out of my own heart:
{16:29} If these men pass away by the common death of men, or if they will be visited by a scourge, of a kind by which others are often visited, then the Lord did not send me.
{16:30} But if the Lord accomplishes something new, so that the earth opens its mouth and swallows them whole, along with everything that belongs to them, and they descend alive into the underworld, then you shall know that they have blasphemed the Lord.”
{16:31} Therefore, as soon as he had ceased to speak, the earth broke open under their feet.
{16:32} And opening its mouth, it devoured them with their tabernacles and their entire substance.
The common scourge of nature, are not sent by the Lord. No such thing would be a sign from God, not even in favor of Moses. Signs are when “the Lord accomplishes something new”, for example, when there is a miracle, such as at Fatima (the miracle of the Sun), or, in another example, a miracle of the Eucharist.
Regarding Popes, we are given clear doctrines from the Lord Jesus, confirmed infallibly in the correct interpretation by the Magisterium:
{16:18} And I say to you, that you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my Church, and the gates of Hell shall not prevail against it.
{16:19} And I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. And whatever you shall bind on earth shall be bound, even in heaven. And whatever you shall release on earth shall be released, even in heaven.”
{22:32} But I have prayed for you, so that your faith may not fail, and so that you, once converted, may confirm your brothers.”
{21:15} Then, when they had dined, Jesus said to Simon Peter, “Simon, son of John, do you love me more than these?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.”
{21:16} He said to him again: “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” He said to him, “Yes, Lord, you know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my lambs.”
{21:17} He said to him a third time, “Simon, son of John, do you love me?” Peter was very grieved that he had asked him a third time, “Do you love me?” And so he said to him: “Lord, you know all things. You know that I love you.” He said to him, “Feed my sheep.
Then the interpretation is clear from later magisterial teachings, that the Church is indefectible, and that Peter and his successors have the charism of truth and never-failing faith. [See this article for sources.
Absolutely nothing should be concluded from an alleged lightning strike anywhere. When lightning reportedly struck the Vatican at the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI, this was not a sign of the anger of God. Such an idea is superstitious and pagan. Lighting often strikes tall buildings.
According to Vatican I, each and every Roman Pontiff has the same authority given to Saint Peter by Christ. We do not look to signs from nature to determine if we should accept the authority of a successor of Peter, nor to determine if we, God forbid, should refuse submission to any Pope — which is the grave sin of schism and carries the penalty of automatic excommunication.
God teaches and guides His people through His Church, established by Christ, and founded on Peter and his successors. To ignore or contradict the authority, teaching, and guidance of any Pope, on the excuse of a lightning strike or other natural event, is gravely sinful. Christ did not teach any such thing.
[Matthew 16]
{16:1} And Pharisees and Sadducees approached him to test him, and they asked him to show them a sign from heaven.
{16:2} But he responded by saying to them: “When evening arrives, you say, ‘It will be calm, for the sky is red,’
{16:3} and in the morning, ‘Today there will be a storm, for the sky is red and gloomy.’ So then, you know how to judge the appearance of the sky, but you are unable to know the signs of the times?
{16:4} An evil and adulterous generation seeks a sign. And a sign shall not be given to it, except the sign of the prophet Jonah.” And leaving them behind, he went away.
The appearance of the sky is a sign of the approaching WEATHER!! It is not a sign about the Church. The signs of the times are the increasing sinfulness of society, and the sign of Jonah was the death of Christ and His resurrection on the third day. The death and resurrection of Christ is our sign. The words of Christ and His Church is our teacher and guide.
Ronald L Conte Jr
the reproach of Christ 
I do not think that the lightning hitting the statue was random, especially on this date and in this place. Also given what has been happening in the Church lately (blessing irregular unions). I just don’t think it’s random.
About the 2nd image:
1. “the After photo has no shadow” – certainly, in a cloudy day you get no shadows.
2. “different coloring to the side of the building, possibly caused by photoshopping” – different weather conditions (as sunny/cloudy) are the cause, not photoshop.
Other issues:
3. “striking a statue near ground level, set into the side of a building is highly unlikely” – that’s right, even with metal parts, as the building itself has metallic elements on the top but… if the story is real we’ll may have reasons to find other cause than, simply, nature or coincidence.
4. From the Sanctuary is said: “The interpretation of the facts that circulate through these media is not real…” – so we can assume that “the facts” ARE real.
“Merely natural events are not signs from God” – that is not so. That is not so by Holy Infallible Scripture.
Have you ever seen the “Iris”? God’s bow? It is a full double rainbow and amazingly spectacular, however, you could argue it is perfectly “natural.” It is exceptionally rare.
God’s bow is mentioned in Holy Scripture as a SIGN. There is a “natural explanation” – however, when I saw it, it was associated with prophecy and prayer, and the probability of it so remote and ridiculous, that one realizes one is seeing a SIGN from God.
And that word SIGN is loaded. There are SIGN icons that have the Divine Unutterable NAME embedded in them, if you know where and how to look. But that takes “faith.”
As to the lightning strike, the probability of it hitting in the area of that Church, in the province of Buenos Aires, the northern boundary of it (which has signature significance in iconography), is incredibly low. Any hit of lightning near it is near 9 million to 1 using Florida’s high lightning strike rate and a single day of the year – but on the Pope’s birthday where he made final plans to issue a clearly heretical document the very next day? Are you kidding? We are now hundreds of millions to 1.
And then it is near ground level on a building facade, where there are metal railings leading upward below it, and above clearly lightning rods – now we are at a billions to 1 odds.
There are odds associated with the “Iris” – God’s bow. And they are in the billions to 1 neighborhood too.
Maybe it is time to realize PROVIDENCE and GOD’S every REAL PRESENCE everywhere and in all things. You made Jesus someone who died 2000 years ago and have a vicarious as leader of your temporal Church. Jesus IS ALIVE and ‘with us always even unto the end of the Age – Amen.’
“Oh heavenly King, Oh Comforter and Spirit of Truth who are in all places and fills all things, treasury of good things and giver of life, come and abide in us and cleanse us from every stain, and save our souls oh Good One…”
Hello – google earth had a photo in their street view from 6 years ago, here: https://maps.app.goo.gl/A51SHZZK1LryCA4L6?g_st=ic
No recent photos though. Seems like more of the spiritual war that is ongoing to distract the faithful about the joys of the Christmas season. I personally was distracted enough to find the google street view images.
The only way to truely verify this if someone post a youtube video. I’ve read that a priest finally did verify the incident.
That was not a priest associated with the Sanctuary
If you look at the church picture posted by Ron above, and zoom on the statue’s location you will see that it is very much below the cornice behind, roughly half a foot. In addition, the statue is right against the wall. So, even if one takes a picture from below, right in front of it, there is no way you would get an appearance like in the pic “after” that the statue is actually taller than the cornice.
So sad to see that now the priests are divided as “Bergoglian” and what would be the other “anti-Bergoglian priests” maybe? Isn’t it much worse than the lightning itself? Didn’t Our Lady say the bishops will be against bishops?
How to comment the fire in Notre Dame? How to comment the many misfortunes that happened throughout the past centuries when not only the Church but also the faithful were much more homogenous and traditional in their views? Why the Black Death happened in Europe? Why Spain was conquered for how many centuries by the Saracens?
I read one of the links you provided in one comment:
“Buenos Aires: lightning on the halo and keys of St. Peter. Bergoglio at the end of the road?” well…pope Francis is at 87 now, this is a matter of fact. But if we put the things so simplified, we will not reach far. There were popes who stayed only several years or even months, and yet left trace in history and Church. St John XXIII for example (forgot he is not recognized by those same people…along with St John Paul II and even now some question the traditional pope Pius XII…what better case of sedevacantism then, they say it with their own words).
What a great work of a simple lightning indeed! Thor will be so angry if you allow me that ridicule…now is pope Bergoglio who draws all attention on himself again even the lightning…Those people don’t realize that by vilifying pope Francis they create him a halo that will remain long after he passes away in the Kingdom of the Father…after a generation those nay sayers will not be remembered. Pope Francis will, as well as the enormous struggle he did to make the way for the Love in the Gospel and not the letter of the law that kills (ref. St Paul).
Let say the picture is real. Someone said that a priest supporter of the pope said so.
1. Why should we assume that it is a MUST that the lightning that hit the statue of St Peter should be sent by God as a sign?
2. Could we assume just the opposite – the lightning was directed by the Devil so the faith of the faithful will be shaken?
3. And of course it could be just natural cause – you have metal objects the key and the halo.
I remember one funny cartoon about the vikings who made an iron statue of Thor. Of course it drew all the lightnings on it. The shaman said it was a sign of Thor’s non benevolence because the vikings didn’t follow the shaman’s directions. Then they decided to move the statue in his yard. The lightnings started falling there…
I thank God I was not born in the Middle ages. Probably I wouldn’t survive it so long.
(there are two Bens posting here, see the codes).