-
Those who reject the Magisterium, grasp at straws seeking its replacement.
-
Click here for a list of my Roman Catholic theology books and booklets, including books about the future.
-
To read the Kindle versions of my books, without a Kindle device, get the free cloud reader — or — any of the free Kindle reading apps.
The CPDV — my conservative Catholic translation of the Bible, from the Latin Vulgate into English, is available at Amazon.com in Kindle format and online here.
Meta
Subscribe to my RSS Feed. (If you use Google Chrome, first add a Chrome RSS reader or extension.)
Wagner boss Prigozhin declares “Take no prisoners” violating 1907 Hague Convention
Here is the news story, Wagner Group boss tells his mercenaries ‘not to take POWs’, as reported by the Kyiv Independent in Ukraine.
Prigozhin tried to justify this decision by saying that they would only be required to protect enemy combatants once they are taken in as prisoners of war (POWs). He claimed that killing enemy troops on the battlefield is always justifiable. However, this is not how international law regards such a situation. In particular the 1907 Hague Convention, to which Russia is a signatory (in 1909), forbids declaring “no quarter”, which is exactly what Prigozhin is doing. Declaring no quarter means declaring that you will not take prisoners.
To make this even more clear, the Hague Convention specifies that it is against the Convention to kill defenseless or surrendering enemy combatants on the battlefield as well as to declare that you will not take prisoners of war:
To comply with the Convention, Russian troops, as well as Wagner troops, must accept prisoners of war, including those who have laid down their arms, or who no longer have a means of defense, for example, if they run out of ammunition, or if a particular troop is badly wounded. And it is particularly forbidden to make a declaration that one will not take prisoners, which is what declaring “no quarter” means. So Prigozhin’s declaration must be withdrawn, and Prigozhin must instruct his troops to take prisoners.
Does it matter that the Wagner Group is not a regular part of the Russian military? No. The Hague Convention also applies to “belligerents”, as defined in Art. 1: “The laws, rights, and duties of war apply not only to armies, but also to militia and volunteer corps….” Wagner meets the conditions for “belligerents”, if they perhaps do not meet the conditions to be considered regular military troops. So, regardless of whether they are considered regular military or not, Wagner is still under the Hague Convention, to which the Russia is a signatory since 1909. This was before the U.S.S.R. began (in 1922), so Russia was a signatory as the Russian Empire.
Ronald L. Conte Jr.
Related