Here it is in full and unedited, Glen Greenwald’s Substack Blog post of his article on Joe and Hunter Biden, which the Intercept Editors refused to publish — in direct contradiction to Greenwald’s employment contract giving him editorial and publication freedom. The Intercept’s NY Editors all favor Biden in the election, and they are making certain that the Intercept does not present fair and unbiased, or even uncensored ‘point of view’ journalism, but instead protects and advances their personal favorite for the election, Joe Biden.
Fox News: “Today I sent my intention to resign from The Intercept, the news outlet I co-founded in 2013 with Jeremy Scahill and Laura Poitras, as well as from its parent company First Look Media,” he wrote. “The final, precipitating cause is that The Intercept’s editors, in violation of my contractual right of editorial freedom, censored an article I wrote this week, refusing to publish it unless I remove all sections critical of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden, the candidate vehemently supported by all New-York-based Intercept editors involved in this effort at suppression.”
“Not content to simply prevent publication of this article at the media outlet I co-founded, these Intercept editors also demanded that I refrain from exercising a separate contractual right to publish this article with any other publication,” Greenwald wrote. [Greenwald Quits Intercept]
When Glen Greenwald was hired away from theguardian in the UK, he was offered two things to secure his contract with First Look Media and the Intercept: money and creative control — and lots of both. His contractual agreements specifically exclude the type of editorial censorship to which he has been subjected by the Intercept’s NY Editors. They have blatantly violated his contract, and they forced him to quit — which is constructive discharge and also an employment contract violation — rather than honor the terms of his contract, all to protect Joe Biden’s election chances.
The Intercept was founded in order to provide uncensored journalism which other media outlets would not present. And now the organization has become corrupted from its own founding principles. And its editors are trying to corrupt the democratic process, by making certain that good journalism is excluded from prominent media outlets if it is contrary to their own desires to unfairly influence a democratic election.
If it would be possible for liberal media outlets to steal an election, it has reached the point that they would do so. As this controversial election unfolds, esp. in the counting of the mail-in ballots and the interpretation of election laws, watch for continued media intervention to usurp the constitutional rules and principles that govern presidential elections