Category Archives: arguments

Who is Fr. Reginaldus of the New Theological Movement blog?

I’ve determined the identity of the priest who posts at the New Theological Movement blog under the pseudonym of Fr. Reginaldus. update: I’ve now disclosed his identity in a new post here along with a photo of him and some … Continue reading

More Galleries | 5 Comments

The single source heresy

In this heresy, a believer relies entirely or mainly on one source, such as one theologian or one Saint, as the basis for a doctrine. Instead of relying on the teachings of Sacred Tradition, and Sacred Scripture, and the Magisterium, … Continue reading

More Galleries

The Moral Theology of Adam

Adam sinned, just as Eve sinned. But he used a different excuse for his sin. He blamed someone else, Eve. {3:12} And Adam said, “The woman, whom you gave to me as a companion, gave to me from the tree, … Continue reading

More Galleries

false argument: the transparent proxy

Another common false argument today, I call the ‘transparent proxy’ argument. A person argues a particular point of view based on the claim that he is merely presenting the views of someone else: a Saint, a Pope, a priest or … Continue reading

Posted in arguments | Comments Off on false argument: the transparent proxy

false argument: one Saint alone

The solus unus sanctus argument claims that a particular idea is either the teaching of the Church, or is at least a tenable theological position, solely because one Saint asserted the idea. This argument is not valid; the conclusion does … Continue reading

Posted in arguments | Comments Off on false argument: one Saint alone

false arguments: pro hominem

I’ve noted with dismay the increasing use of the ‘pro hominem’ (for the man) argument by many Catholics. This argument seeks to support a particular conclusion or idea on faith or morals by heaping complements on the person, such as … Continue reading

Posted in arguments | Comments Off on false arguments: pro hominem

false arguments: ipse dixit

The phrase ‘ipse dixit’ means ‘he himself said it.’ The term is used to describe a type of argument in which the person presents one or more assertions, as if each statement were certainly true, but without any support. This … Continue reading

Posted in arguments | Comments Off on false arguments: ipse dixit